Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nslhd.intersearch.com.au/nslhdjspui/handle/1/42878
Title: | Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments | Authors: | Bullen, James;Nickel, Brooke;McCaffery, Kirsten;Wilt, Timothy J;Smith, Jenna;Boroumand, Farzaneh;Parker, Lisa ;Millar, Jeremy;Brodersen, John Brandt;Dahm, Philipp;Delahunt, Brett;Varma, Murali;Glasziou, Paul;Warden, Andrew;Diller, Lawrence;Billington, Larry;van Rensburg, Christo;Bell, Katy | Affiliation: | School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.;Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.;Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research and Minneapolis VA High Value Care Initiative, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.;Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.;Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health & Research Unit for General Practice, Region Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.;Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromso, Norway. Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.;Urology Section, Minneapolis Veterans Administration Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Health Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Health Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia katy.bell@sydney.edu.au.;Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. |
Department: | Radiation Oncology | Issue Date: | 9-Aug-2024 | Publication information: | 14:e085947 | Journal: | BMJ | Abstract: | Many types of prostate cancer present minimal risk to a man's lifespan or well-being, but existing terminology makes it difficult for men to distinguish these from high-risk prostate cancers. This study aims to explore whether using an alternative label for low-risk prostate cancer influences management choice and anxiety levels among Australian men and their partners. We will run two separate studies for Australian men and Australian women with a male partner. Both studies are between-subjects factorial (3×2) randomised online hypothetical experiments. Following consent, eligible participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to three labels: 'low-risk prostate cancer, Gleason Group 1', 'low-risk prostate neoplasm' or 'low-risk prostate lesion'. Participants will then undergo a second randomisation step with 1:1 allocation to the provision of detailed information on the benefits and harms of different management choices versus the provision of less detailed information about management choices. The required sample sizes are 1290 men and 1410 women. The primary outcome is the participant choice of their preferred management strategy: no immediate treatment (prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based monitoring or active surveillance using PSA, MRI, biopsy with delayed treatment for disease progression) versus immediate treatment (prostatectomy or radiation therapy). Secondary outcomes include preferred management choice (from the four options listed above), diagnosis anxiety, management choice anxiety and management choice at a later time point (for participants who initially choose a monitoring strategy). Ethics approval has been received from The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/572). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal and a plain language summary of the findings will be shared on the Wiser Healthcare publications page http://www.wiserhealthcare.org.au/category/publications/ TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID 386701 and 386889). | URI: | https://nslhd.intersearch.com.au/nslhdjspui/handle/1/42878 | DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085947 | ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
Type: | Article | Keywords: | Adverse events;Clinical Decision-Making;Clinical Trial;Patient-Centered Care;Prostatic Neoplasms;Surgical pathology |
Appears in Collections: | Research Publications |
Show full item record
Items in NSLHD are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.